We take one workflow from prototype to live with real users, then hand the code and the system over to the team that will own it.
A prototype convinces a room. Production has to survive the person who asks badly, the document that changed last night, and the reviewer who wants to see where the answer came from.
We build it in your environment, on your accounts. Most of the time goes on what a demo never shows, and at handover your internal team runs it with the code sitting in your repository.
Three builds that reached real users inside the firms that commissioned them, each running in the client's own environment.
Technology
A technology company of more than 500 people replaced disconnected purchase requests, informal approvals and separate records with one procurement workflow it owns.
Read the case study: Bringing fragmented procurement into one workflow
Professional services
A professional services organization with teams in several locations put the steps, templates, and approvals behind a proposal in one place, answerable in chat.
Read the case study: Standardizing proposal writing across a distributed team
Professional services
A consulting firm answers recurring client questions around the clock from its own guides, in its own tone, without pulling the team off client work.
Read the case study: Building a self-service client experience with a branded assistant
No. The pilot is part of the build, and it happens with a small group of your own people on real questions. It exists to find what internal testing does not, which is usually how a question gets phrased rather than whether an answer is correct.
Add and remove document sources, adjust prompts when a policy changes, and read the query record for questions that come up often. It is a few hours a week for people who already know the workflow.
You do. The code, the prompts and the configuration are written into your own repository and accounts while the build runs, so there is nothing to hand across at the end and nothing of ours in the middle. It keeps working whether or not we do.
We do not. The second workflow waits until the first one is live and being used, because the first build is where you learn what your documents and approvals really cost. Running two in parallel doubles the guesswork.
Name the workflow that hurts most and the people who run it. We will tell you what it takes to put it in front of real users in your own environment.